Butterfly Labs – Buttcoin Foundation http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org Buttcoin - It's Bitcoins with Butts! Wed, 07 Jun 2017 22:27:42 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.7.5 Butterfly Labs gets FTC injunction lifted, reaffirms they fucking rock, bro. http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-gets-ftc-injunction-lifted-reaffirms-they-fucking-rock-bro http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-gets-ftc-injunction-lifted-reaffirms-they-fucking-rock-bro#comments Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:34:45 +0000 http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/?p=3274 Butterfly Labs asserted its alpha-male dominance on that bitch-ass FTC today. BFL literally whipped its dick out for the world to see and showed everyone that BFL really stands for “Better Fucking Listen” because that’s what you gotta do now you little weak-ass punks. Today the judge just straight up said “Fuck yeah, bro” and […]

The post Butterfly Labs gets FTC injunction lifted, reaffirms they fucking rock, bro. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>

Butterfly Labs asserted its alpha-male dominance on that bitch-ass FTC today. BFL literally whipped its dick out for the world to see and showed everyone that BFL really stands for “Better Fucking Listen” because that’s what you gotta do now you little weak-ass punks.

Today the judge just straight up said “Fuck yeah, bro” and high-fived BFL’s totally swole hand and then they both cupped balls. This rad judge�let the world know that BFL, while it’s true that they did delay a bunch of shit and straight-up lie to their customers, isn’t�doing it�any more and so the FTC has no right to be all up in their shit.

bfl-injunction-lifted

You see that idiots? BFL stopped doing preorders because our customers finally wised the fuck up so you have NO RIGHT to take their�foam pitchforks.

Also remember how the FTC was all like “Ugh, these BFL guys said you could make money off these things?” when we’ve known that’s not true? Well chew on this:

bfl-injunction-lifted2

Read it and weep hombre. BLF told it’s customers on forums that it was profitable but didn’t have it on their own website. Also they bought a shit ton of fucking google ads so .. ya know .. �fucking right, idiots!

So now BFL�can continue on with business as usual and just be a fucking badass and you pansies have to just take it.

Inaba (who totally isn’t Josh from BFL) has this to say about you�nerds, crying to mommy:

bfl-injunction-lifted3

Who run this town? Butterfly Labs run this town!

Until the actual trial starts next year and they’re fucked.

 

 

The post Butterfly Labs gets FTC injunction lifted, reaffirms they fucking rock, bro. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-gets-ftc-injunction-lifted-reaffirms-they-fucking-rock-bro/feed 1
Butterfly Labs Has Become a Legal Clusterfuck http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-has-become-a-legal-clusterfuck http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-has-become-a-legal-clusterfuck#comments Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:32:55 +0000 http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/?p=2825 On October 28th the FTC released a statement opposing the defendants of the Butterfly Labs case (Darla Drake, Nasser Ghoseiri and Sonny Vleisides) intent�to pay for their attorney fees with frozen funds. If you remember fondly, Butterfly Labs stole that cash from consumers, so the FTC is saying they shouldn’t be allowed�to�use said stolen funds […]

The post Butterfly Labs Has Become a Legal Clusterfuck appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>

On October 28th the FTC released a statement opposing the defendants of the Butterfly Labs case (Darla Drake, Nasser Ghoseiri and Sonny Vleisides) intent�to pay for their attorney fees with frozen funds. If you remember fondly, Butterfly Labs stole that cash from consumers, so the FTC is saying they shouldn’t be allowed�to�use said stolen funds to support/defend themselves. Note that this is just them opposing it, since they aren’t actually ruling on anything. That’s the courts job.

Meanwhile, the Western Missouri District Court just published a new�2 page order saying Butterfly Labs needs to stop acting like a huge asshole or else they’re going to be called into court for�a separate case to talk about their behavior.

So whats been going on? According to the report:

BFL4

Disclosure: This was between pages 1 and 2, so that line is where the page split. The quote is continuous, just like your mom.

Basically, BFL is being a child, and everyone else is being the adult telling them not to throw their spaghetti at the waitress, then call her fat. There are�no specifics, but we’d like to assume its the same “YOU DON’T KNOW THE TRUTH” stuff, only against “THE MAN”, but without anyone around to point out to them how stupid that tactic is.

Between not being able to pay for their attorneys with stolen funds and possibly having 2 cases against them in the same court, Butterfly Labs�is completely fucked.

Butterfly Labs is currently being operated by a court approved Temporary Receiver (TR). That means that whoever the court places in that role manages the company until the court makes a decision to return control back to the original owners, or something else (in this case, die slowly yet hilariously, like a man falling into an open sewer and suffocating on jenkem fumes). In this case the TR is Eric Johnson of the firm Spencer Fane�and, looking at his bio, is absolutely qualified to do so. The court, if it finds Butterfly Labs innocent (since this is all just a big misunderstanding after all) will give Butterfly Labs back control and resume operations. Presumably then, the orders will be shipped and everyone will be happy until their miners become obsolete in 2 days.

Except that’s not going to happen because Butterfly Labs is clearly guilty. And with the Temporary Receiver and Court being harassed by these idiots, how do you really think this is going to go down? Well, until it goes the way we hope it does, the company cannot do refunds, take calls, or really do much of anything. This affects 20,000 people waiting for orders that will probably not be fulfilled, and with this distraction refunds will be delayed.

And again, to be clear, some of the tasks of a Temporary Receiver is to run the company so that it can make money to get itself out of the hole. This�includes closing entire sections of a business because it costs too much money or finding assets. The FTC is alleging Butterfly Labs stole up to $50 Million in consumer funds and that could mean there might not be enough for refunds.

So the receiver�and the court are�working on a limited time frame here to do their respective jobs, and Butterfly Labs is harassing them, plus the FTC’s lawyers, and potentially stalling this case out so they can take a court ordered “sit in the corner”-type punishment.

So if you do not get your refund, or if its severely delayed, blame Butterfly Labs for acting like gigantic assholes, turning their company into a legal clusterfuck of both existing (but run by a court) and not existing (its probably going to die in court). If Bitcoin is the honey badger, and the honey badger has no fear of anything, maybe its time for Bitcoin to learn some fucking manners and not attack everything simply because it’s “The Currency of the Future”.

The post Butterfly Labs Has Become a Legal Clusterfuck appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-has-become-a-legal-clusterfuck/feed 2
An In-Depth Look at how Butterfly Labs is Going to Lose in Court to the FTC http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/an-in-depth-look-at-how-butterfly-labs-is-going-to-lose-in-court-to-the-ftc http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/an-in-depth-look-at-how-butterfly-labs-is-going-to-lose-in-court-to-the-ftc#comments Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:42:07 +0000 http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/?p=2502 UPDATE: Butterfly Labs Motion to Dismiss has been denied, presumably because they broke some rule on page limits. We should take that as their rant (covered below) was too long for THE MAN to take. The Federal Trade Commission filed Case �4:14-cv-00815-BCW� on September 15th, 2014. In their report, the FTC claims that BFL did […]

The post An In-Depth Look at how Butterfly Labs is Going to Lose in Court to the FTC appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
UPDATE: Butterfly Labs Motion to Dismiss has been denied, presumably because they broke some rule on page limits. We should take that as their rant (covered below) was too long for THE MAN to take.

The Federal Trade Commission filed Case �4:14-cv-00815-BCW� on September 15th, 2014. In their report, the FTC claims that BFL did a bunch of dumb things.�These include:

Refusing to refund payment, by flipping between two policies: No refunds, and refund offers that were never fulfilled.
Josh Zerlan, Vice President of Product Development, testified�that BFL used pre-paid rigs to mine for BTC before shipping (if they were even shipped). This may explain why some were broken messes by the time they got to customers.
Because the products were shipped so late (or not at all), the rigs were incredibly outdated, and because of that, miners couldn’t use the rigs properly. �(Via FTC):FTC_2
Refusing to ship the BitForce miner months after pre-orders, then using deceptive marketing to get people to buy or upgrade to a newer miner, the Monarch.

For these reasons, primarily, the FTC had temporarily shut down operations at Butterfly Labs (From what I understand, some operations have since resumed after a TRO elapsed. More on that later). The FTC has said in their later report:

Given their record of repeated law violations, Defendants [Butterfly Labs] cannot expect the Court simply to take their word�for it that they have abandoned their illegal conduct for good� Defendants� business survives upon income obtained through misrepresentations about timely delivery and profitability that�should be returned to their�victims…�[The] Defendants have failed to explain why the Court should�permit them to resume operations and deplete assets available for consumer redress, especially in light of the Commission�s likelihood of success on�the merits. (Case�4:14-cv-00815-BCW�Document�42)

Yeah.

About that last bit, the �Success on the merits� part. As detailed earlier, BFL is fucked. The FTC has multiple points (and evidence) on BFL�s deceptive practices that are quite compelling. These include:

BFL admitting that they were behind schedule, while using vague terms that didn’t set a firm ship date. Like, openly saying �Two months or longer� to consumers. Which is not considered “Qualifying language”, AKA �Not some vague bullshit�. BFL later admitted that, with Bitcoin mining, �Time was of the essence�. They ended up never shipping most of their orders, and the ones that did ship, as mentioned earlier, were outdated due to the difficulty rate constantly increasing. That basically means that because the miners weren’t delivered on time despite the company admitting that, in order for their product to be competitive, it had to be operational ASAP, the rare few who did receive their broken, piece of shit machines could not recoup their costs and, therefore, lost a ton of money.
That stupid calculator they put everywhere, stupidly. (More below)
The language used to explain shipping delays specifically was �Feeble�, and any excuses they use are bullshit because they clearly were not shipping anything or being reasonable in the meantime.
They lied about testing the Monarch chip, saying it was nearly finished with “Taping” when, in fact, it was barely even beginning, with internal messages saying to expect shipment in early February 2014. This was November 2013.
Around the same time they were panicking about the Monarch chip not being close to done, they sent an email blast promising early 2014 would be the ship date. This is, again, vague, not qualifying language, and also�deceptive marketing, because it is claiming that a product that is not close to being done is close to being done, and pre-orders are open now! What a great source of revenue: people trying to jump into the mining game not knowing that BFL was supposed to ship that product months earlier!
They claim to have a full refund policy for orders between August 9th-November 9th, 2013. Hilariously, they have no documents proving this, making this one of, if not BFL’s�most blatant lie when you realize the FTC had to consult �The Blogosphere� to see how customers had to force refunds via Credit Card disputes or lawsuits. The main thing from all of the comments in each thread is simple: BFL did not willingly refund a single damn order, probably in part to their confusing refund policy explained earlier. We’ll call it “Kafkaesque”.
Later on, they allowed consumers an option to upgrade their order without disclosing that by doing so, they would void their opportunity to get a refund. That is illegal, since you have to notify consumers when you change details like that. Its why you get an email from eBay or PayPal or Tumblr saying “Our Terms of Service have changed”.
By the FTC�s count, BFL had 3 major products that did not ship: BitForce, Monarch and their Cloud�Mining�service that charged $10/GHS using their Monarch miners. Yet they still advertised new products and accepted pre-orders.
Not one BFL consumer, not a single one out of 20,000 paid-in-full consumers, got a BFL miner on its original ship date. And even if there was a reasonable delay, since this is supposedly very high-tech stuff were dealing with here, and delays do happen, BFL still has literal tons of Monarch orders left to ship almost a year after the original ship date. That’s unreasonable for any company with orders paid-in-full.
Those stupid �Y U NO SHIP� pitchforks from our last article on BFL? The FTC sees that as the company mocking their customers. And it�s kinda hard to deny.

M4J11vT

Nothing says “We love our customers” than using funds that should go to shipping a product instead going to mass ordering foam pitchforks and torches. BFL 1, FTC 0.

The calculator bit is an important one. For those not aware, BFL posted a calculator on its Facebook and Tumblr accounts, as well as its website and a few other official BFL pages, telling people they could see how much they could potentially earn with their rigs, based on the current difficulty level, exchange rate and how much electricity costs. The FTC says the calculator showed when someone would break even with the machine using the calculator. This is a problem, because since the machine never shipped, these calculations would equal an outdated and useless miner, if and when they finally got their machine. There�s also the fact that an employee of BFL has said they lied about how powerful the machines actually were, meaning the calculations outputted were always wrong, thereby misleading customers, a serious charge that will most likely be one of the main reasons BFL will crumble.

So, in the end, what is the FTC charging them under? The Federal Trade Commission�Act of 1914, a law President Woodrow Wilson signed to stop monopolies and unfair trade practices. Section 5(a) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. � 45(a), prohibits �unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce”, which, as demonstrated above, BFL has done in fucking spades. Here’s the full list of violations:

FTC_4

I’d also like to add “Conspiracy”, just to see Reddit go insane.

AND, before we get to BFL�s rebuttal, let�s not forget that BFL Co-Founder and Innovation Officer Sonny Vleisides engaged in mail fraud by participating in a lottery scheme run by his dad that, internationally, netted $25 Million dollars from victims. He was still on probation when all this insanity occurred, so out of all of them, his odds are the worst.

His Prison name was "SonnyV".

His Prison name was “SonnyV”.

So…�What was BFL�s response?

Hilarity.

BFL contends that the FTC is basically Dirty Harry, a good cop gone rogue because of their foaming at the mouth hatred of all things Bitcoin and Butterfly Labs, despite the fact that the FTC noted in its earlier report that the IRS has decided to let Bitcoin be counted as taxable property, and therefore okey-dokey.

BFL called the FTC �Kafkaesque�, with the following footnote:

�From a certain point onward there is no longer any turning back. That is the point that must be reached.� � Franz Kafka, The Trial.

According to Wikiquote, that is actually from Kafka�s 1918 work �Aphorisms�. Also, the FTC is not acting Kafkaesque, its doing its job. The refund thing from earlier? That is definitely Kafkaesque.

The first footnote, the very first one, is very adamant about how much the FTC is on a �Campaign� to �Destroy� Butterfly Labs. The quote that follows inside the footnote is as docile as an actual butterfly�s queef:

�We often see that when a new and little-understood opportunity like Bitcoin presents itself, scammers will find ways to capitalize on the public�s excitement and interest,� said Jessica Rich, director of the FTC�s Bureau of Consumer Protection. �We�re pleased the court granted our request to halt this operation, and we look forward to putting the company�s ill-gotten gains back in the hands of consumers.�

Considering the harm these guys have done to thousands of paying customers, that is as calm and reasonable as it gets.

Despite the FTC�s pretty good explanation of what Bitcoin mining is in its first affidavit, BFL is claiming that THE MAN COULD NEVER UNDERSTAND THE BIGGER PICTURE, MAAAAAAAAN.

BFL_1

Because nothing makes sense if you don’t BELIEVE!

And here is the first page (of 2) from the FTC explaining the basics of Bitcoin:

 

FTC_3

I’d keep going to the next page, but I think I’ve made my point.

Moreover, their argument that the FTC’s claims don’t matter because they don’t understand Bitcoin (They do) is bullshit as well, because you don’t need to understand something to know its a scam. I don’t know a thing about chemistry, but when I see con artists selling juice they claim cures AIDS, I know that’s bullshit. We all know buttsex�is how you cure AIDS.

I get a very weird Boston Legal-esque vibe from this motion to dismiss. It�s like some guy at BFL handed in a megalomaniacal rant about how the government hates him and his company to a lawyer, and the lawyer was like �I think I can translate this into legalese�.� Case in point:

… if he BOTHERED to pick up the phone, which I know must have been SOOOOOOOOOO HARD, then asked just ONE question about this thing they CLEARLY don’t know about…

That is an actual quote, from a real court document. That is so out-of-bounds rude for any case document I�ve seen in a while. Even the Whitey Bulger trial docs had class, and that guy ran the Winter Hill Gang! They based Jack Nicholson�s character from �The Departed� on him! Yes, that guy! This document is more offensive than Bulger�s trial, and the fact that he actually killed people is on public record, in pretty graphic detail. Depictions of bodies are less offensive than this motion to dismiss. I�m sure there are other motions on record somewhere with language this glaringly condescending, but I haven�t seen it. I think, side by side, this motion for dismissal�will be used to teach law students how to lose a case before the trial has even begun.

The main problem with the language is the condescension. It is clear that whoever wrote the rant that was translated into legal babble thinks he understands Bitcoin than anyone else, even Satoshi, and just KNOWS that no one inside the FTC could possibly understand such a broad concept as digital currency, because OBAMA.�I’d be willing to bet .000001 BTC that whoever decided to add condescension to their motion against the federal government’s case is probably one of the three main BFL officers listed in the original trial docs.

In fact, going through this whole document, it reads less like a professional defense of a company accused by the government of defrauding investors, and more like if you took the out of touch and not at all accurate legal advice from the comments posted on /r/Bitcoin, got said comments complied into one dump of quotes, and shipped it to a law firm with some of the more confident Libertarians standing in the room, bull-headed as ever, demanding their constitutionally protected day in court be as close to Perry Mason Syndrome as possible.

BFL_3

Yeah, guys, you could have TRIED to learn SOMETHING.

They did ship some of their �Jalapeno� units, and, in fact, did ship other products as well. It isn’t disputed that some product was shipped. However, there doesn’t seem to be any documentation saying it was 45,000 units. There really isn’t any proof of that 45,000 unit number besides them just making it up. Note that there is no footnote, and there isn’t one on any other page mentioning that number. They are blatantly lying in their motion to dismiss against the FTC. I don’t know if that’s a felony or not, but I hope to God it is.

But that�s not the point. They very well may have shipped 45,000 units, but in the meantime they were refusing to refund customers, mining BTC with pre-ordered machines, not shipping paid-in-full units to customers, and then mocked said paying customers with those stupid foam pitchforks. According to�the FTC, BFL didn�t ship anything to something like 20,000 people who had already paid for their machines. �That�s the point: That they conspired to use customer funds to make equipment for themselves, and then ship it off to the customers when they were done. If that wasn’t their plan in the beginning, it certainly became their plan after, lets say, 2 days.

FTC_1

Via FTC.

This:

Yeah, FTC, you could have at least TRIED to see we were already being sued for what you’re accusing us of doing.

Oh, so NOW the FTC wants to protect consumers, even though we were already being sued for our deceptive practices by someone else! They should have stopped us sooner! Well, it�s too late now, and that�s how law works, so I think were in the clear.

And for those wondering about the footnote, well�

If Plaintiff already knew about the District of Kansas putative class action when it filed its ex parte papers, it had an ethical obligation to inform the Court of the existence of that case.

Basically, the FTC should have known they were already being sued in Kansas, and by not putting that in their briefing they�re basically liars, even though the FTC did mention that there were �at least 2 lawsuits against BFL in the past, in its first report.

They seem to have lost touch with reality. This, by the way, was the best part of their whole motion:

BFL_6

Y’know, on one hand, they’re calling us fraudsters, but on the other, they’re letting us back in the building, so we win, right?

I seriously cannot fathom the stupidity it must take to write that second paragraph.�BFL is basically saying �The FTC CLAIMS that we stole up to $50 Million dollars from thousands of customers, yet they let us reopen our doors! They must have finally opened their eyes to the future of Bitcoin! It was all just a big mistake!”

Lets explain: On September 23rd, the FTC announced that, through court order, BFL was shut down through a Temporary Restraining Order, or TRO, on the grounds that the three main officers, Darla Drake, Nasser Ghoseiri, and Sonny Vleisides, respectively the treasurer, CTO and Innovation officer, had done all the fun stuff we�ve covered. Because it was so blatantly obvious that BFL was going to continue doing what it was doing (And, based on the language here, they DEFINITELY would, since they don’t seem to see what they did wrong), the FTC got a TEMPORARY restraining order, meaning that for a short period of time, operations would cease.

What they are contending in that second paragraph is that because a temporary restraining order lapsed, the FTC has no case. Because, as we all know, when time elapses on a legal matter� law.

There is absolutely no point to their contention here. Because the TRO ended, and the Judge decided he wasn�t going to renew it, they win. Because law.

We’ll be keeping track of this story, and any updates will be posted on our new main site, ButtcoinFoundation.org, or by following us on Twitter. Or don’t, I don’t give a shit.

The post An In-Depth Look at how Butterfly Labs is Going to Lose in Court to the FTC appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/an-in-depth-look-at-how-butterfly-labs-is-going-to-lose-in-court-to-the-ftc/feed 4
Butterfly Labs is fucked http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-is-fucked http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-is-fucked#comments Mon, 06 Oct 2014 17:12:01 +0000 http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/?p=2408 Just like the title says. Logs and depositions are coming out showing how much BFL did to defraud customers, other companies, banks, and whatever else. Some highlights:     You can find more of these wonderful and amazing documents here and here. UPDATED: evilweasel posted: interim order: https://www.documentcloud.org/docum…17531-54-0.html there’s a lot of boilerplate bullshit but […]

The post Butterfly Labs is fucked appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>

Just like the title says. Logs and depositions are coming out showing how much BFL did to defraud customers, other companies, banks, and whatever else. Some highlights:

 

BFLfucked03

See below

M4J11vT

HOW CAN I GET ONE OF THESE

BFLfucked04

I can single-handedly build a house faster than it takes for BFL to ship.

BFLfucked02

Box of fans� is apparently an official BFL product

BFLfucked01

Yes what is �structuring�?

 

You can find more of these wonderful and amazing documents here and here.

UPDATED:

evilweasel posted:
interim order:

https://www.documentcloud.org/docum…17531-54-0.html

there’s a lot of boilerplate bullshit but the very short version is they can ship out already paid for and finished machines, provided the customer wants them and not a refund, but that’s about it, and in 35 days they can submit a business plan to try to let BFL continue as a going company. this order is the FTC getting everything they wanted, in practice.

the slightly longer version:

1)they are forbidden from taking pre-orders
2)they can’t even think about touching any money or property of bfl, except to turn it over to the receiver
3)every single ‘defendant’ (bfl AND three of the heads) must bring every asset they own into the US and disclose it to the receiver. every asset, not just ones they might have stolen from bfl
4)every single defendant must also provide a complete financial accounting to the receiver – again, of their personal stuff as well
5)the temporary receiver stays in control and can do whatever the fuck he thinks is best
6)bfl can ship machines to people who want a machine but not a refund

without an order from the court:
7)bfl is prohibited from “burn-in” testing
8)bfl CANNOT make refunds
9)bfl can’t make any new sales at all

now, they have 35 days to come up with a business plan that:
1)replaces burn-in testing or justifies and discloses it (and what they’ll do with the money)
2)protects customers and their refund rights
3)lets it keep going as a business

my money is on that business plan gets laughed out of court and the company gets liquidated

 

FCKGW posted:
from reddit:

There are some other intersting items in there
1) No refunds to be issued until audited financial statements are submitted to the court and calculation of assests vs liabilities. They only have 1.2 million in cash on hand and owe ?? from pre-paid orders wanting refunds. Likely to be calculated using the FTCs anyone who wants a refund can request one regardless of BFLs sketchy limitaions.
2) All holdings in Bitcoin to be converted to USD as soon as practical at sub $400 each probably
3) Work by BFL principals is unpaid
4) Business plan will likely require BFL to produce new miners upfront and sell only those units already produced.
5) The principal outside the US doesnt appear to be cooperating with the court / receiver
Seems highly unlikely that BFL and its principals have the capital to cover the liabilities re: refunds let alone front the cost to develop & produce new equipment prior to sale.

 

…! posted:
The entire order is fascinating. It freezes not just the assets of the company, but also the personal assets of Sonny and Jody. They basically have to ask permission from the temporary receiver to buy just about anything.

It also requires BFL to transfer all of their bitcoins to a court-operated wallet. They’ll be exchanged for USD, which will likely go to benefit the victimized customers. I wonder what the “my bitcoins literally cannot be taken away from me by any government unless I so choose” bitcoiners will make of this.

The post Butterfly Labs is fucked appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-is-fucked/feed 1
Alert. Pay-Attention: A laugh was mined that was too big for Buttcoin.org to process http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/alert-pay-attention-a-laugh-was-mined-that-was-too-big-for-buttcoin-org-to-process http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/alert-pay-attention-a-laugh-was-mined-that-was-too-big-for-buttcoin-org-to-process#respond Sat, 04 Oct 2014 22:04:51 +0000 http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/?p=2381 ATTN: USERS OF BUTTCOIN 0.7 Alert. Pay-Attention: A laugh was mined that was too big for 0.7 (Buttcoin.org) to process. 0.8 (ButtcoinFoundation.org) could process it and created a fork, causing prologed outages on the 0.7 Buttcoin fork. The game plan is to shut down the 0.7 laugh factory and continue on the 0.8 fork. Do […]

The post Alert. Pay-Attention: A laugh was mined that was too big for Buttcoin.org to process appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>

ATTN: USERS OF BUTTCOIN 0.7

Alert. Pay-Attention: A laugh was mined that was too big for 0.7 (Buttcoin.org) to process. 0.8 (ButtcoinFoundation.org) could process it and created a fork, causing prologed outages on the 0.7 Buttcoin fork. The game plan is to shut down the 0.7 laugh factory and continue on the 0.8 fork. Do not trust new mined laughs on 0.7.

Additionally, the hard fork created a number of orphaned block-posts so some data may be missing. We expect a roll back to occur in the next few weeks and to back-fill this data as time permits. Please do not bring this to the attention of the devs.

At present, devs are working to establish the precise cause of the bug. We know it’s related to the way 0.7 was purchased by BFL and, specifically, the subsequent seizure of Buttcoin.org by the FTC.

For now, 0.8 is the way to mine laughs, users should not expect 0.7 to come back.I imagine soon enough we will see 0.8.1 and the possibility of a hard fork (0.8 may become incompatible) so keep your eyes open for more news.

(We are

The post Alert. Pay-Attention: A laugh was mined that was too big for Buttcoin.org to process appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/alert-pay-attention-a-laugh-was-mined-that-was-too-big-for-buttcoin-org-to-process/feed 0
Float like a butterfly, sting like the FTC http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/float-like-a-butterfly-sting-like-the-ftc http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/float-like-a-butterfly-sting-like-the-ftc#respond Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:30:38 +0000 http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/?p=2397 At FTC�s Request, Court Halts Bogus Bitcoin Mining Operation At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal court has shut down Butterfly Labs, a Missouri-based company that allegedly deceptively marketed specialized computers designed to produce Bitcoins, a payment system sometimes referred to as �virtual currency.� The FTC�s complaint against the company and its […]

The post Float like a butterfly, sting like the FTC appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
At FTC�s Request, Court Halts Bogus Bitcoin Mining Operation

1290904111787

At the request of the Federal Trade Commission, a federal court has shut down Butterfly Labs, a Missouri-based company that allegedly deceptively marketed specialized computers designed to produce Bitcoins, a payment system sometimes referred to as �virtual currency.�

The FTC�s complaint against the company and its corporate officers alleges that Butterfly Labs charged consumers thousands of dollars for its Bitcoin computers, but then failed to provide the computers until they were practically useless, or in many cases, did not provide the computers at all.

The post Float like a butterfly, sting like the FTC appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/float-like-a-butterfly-sting-like-the-ftc/feed 0
Butterfly Labs caught allegedly faking CE certification, bitcoiner gets his miner seized in Germany. http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-caught-allegedly-faking-ce-certification-bitcoiner-gets-his-miner-seized-in-germany http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-caught-allegedly-faking-ce-certification-bitcoiner-gets-his-miner-seized-in-germany#comments Wed, 03 Jul 2013 22:04:17 +0000 http://buttcoin.org/?p=1807 From BitcoinTalk: Well, one of the german community member posted in the german section that his BFL got seized by the customs. They believe that the CE Zerification is� non-complian and fictional. �They also failed to have a EU conformity declaration and a user handbook with information. The main reason why it got a suspect […]

The post Butterfly Labs caught allegedly faking CE certification, bitcoiner gets his miner seized in Germany. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
From BitcoinTalk:

Well,

one of the german community member posted in the german section that his BFL got seized by the customs. They believe that the CE Zerification is� non-complian and fictional. �They also failed to have a EU conformity declaration and a user handbook with information.

The main reason why it got a suspect by the customs: they included a american power cord in the package! Holy moly what would’ve happend if the user used that cable? USA(120volt)(germany 230volt)

That guy would be burned by now.

The package goes now to the Office of the Federal President for further inspection. �It MAY happen that Butterflylabs gets “blacklisted” by the european custums and all packages that go in the EU gets seized!!!

 

bfl-seized

 

Here’s the document roughly translated:

TOP OF PAGE – CHECK BOX SECTION
CE markings missing or doubtful

Other labeling is missing or doubtful

Manufacturer’s declaration of conformity and other documents are missing or doubtful

LOWER SECTION – CHECK BOX SECTION
Release can not be carried out:

Product not in conformity

Striked out: Marketing was banned, Please notice (note?) in accordance with Article 30, para, 2

LOWER SECTION – WRITTEN COMMENTS

a) The product’s knife plug is not compliant with european standards and does not conform to security requirements outlined in European Directive RL 2006/95/EG

b) Due to the above validity of the CE marking is questionable

c) Product is missing German manual and required producer/importer declarations

 

Just another fuckup in a long line of Butterfly Lab failures

The post Butterfly Labs caught allegedly faking CE certification, bitcoiner gets his miner seized in Germany. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-caught-allegedly-faking-ce-certification-bitcoiner-gets-his-miner-seized-in-germany/feed 12
The $22,484.00 Butterfly Labs Mini Rig bitcoin miner is a huge, broken, unstable piece of shit. http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-mini-rig-is-a-huge-broken-unstable-piece-of-shit http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-mini-rig-is-a-huge-broken-unstable-piece-of-shit#comments Wed, 03 Jul 2013 18:42:52 +0000 http://buttcoin.org/?p=1725 Butterfly Labs has a long and horrible history with their mining rigs. They started taking pre-orders over a year ago, with a ship time sometime in late July. After numerous delays in production, shipping problems and general incompetence, the only thing they’ve managed to get out the door are some of their tiniest miners, the […]

The post The $22,484.00 Butterfly Labs Mini Rig bitcoin miner is a huge, broken, unstable piece of shit. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>

Butterfly Labs has a long and horrible history with their mining rigs. They started taking pre-orders over a year ago, with a ship time sometime in late July. After numerous delays in production, shipping problems and general incompetence, the only thing they’ve managed to get out the door are some of their tiniest miners, the Jalapenos. And those mainly ended up in the hands of reviewers and blogs in order to keep pumping the Butterfly Labs hype train and securing millions of dollars of pre-orders still in limbo.

Lucky BFL forums user Luke-JR however scored a sweet Mini Rig from Butterfly Labs (it’s just a coincidence he’s a driver developer for them I’m sure). This rig was originally promised to produce 1500 GH/shashing power at 1500 watts for $30,000, but has since seen it’s hashing power slashed to a third of what was promised and it’s power consumption increased 75%, now just offer 500 GH/s at 2400 watts. They’ve promised to make good on pre-order buy sending out 3 rigs to match the initial hashing rate, so now it’s only 1500 GH/s at 6900 watts, a reduction in GH/Watt by a factor of 5.

 

So what does $22,484 buy you? Take a look!

Minirig is here!

Today, my Minirig arrived.

butterflylabs-minirig-broken1

FedEx apparently dropped it somewhere along the way, and the weakest part of the case, the thin metal part around the back of the PSU, broke.

butterflylabs-minirig-broken2

I’m not sure how sturdy the back side was supposed to be, but its two pieces aren’t quite together either.

butterflylabs-minirig-broken3

The power supplies (EVGA 1500W) also created havoc interfering with the neutral on the power line. This disrupted X10 communication significantly enough that the pool overflowed because the system controlling it was unable to turn off the pump. Workaround: This PSU supports 240V, so we rewired the outlet. 240V does not use neutral, so now all should be okay.

Edit: 240V workaround is only partial. Still having problems

But the good news is, it all seems to be working for the most part.

Next up, installing it in the window so the heat goes outside

 

A twenty two thousand dollar box of electronics that is broken out of the box, that required the guy to do a sketchy electrical workaround to getpartiallyworking, that he is going to install in a window… and he’s happy about it?

In case you didn’t notice it, the delivered unit is different than the picture on the website. They had to install 2 power supplies instead of 1 and had to modify the case to fit. Also, if you didn’t notice, the LCD/Phone thingy in the front has been replaced by … a piece of cardboard spray painted black. Wonderful.

You could maybe chalk this up to a careless Fedex postman, but when you’re shipping something that costs as much as a mid-sized sedan, how bought putting a little more effort into packing? Dell and HP can ship bigger and heavier servers across the world without this kind of problem.

The unit had to hit its huge power draw increase by putting dual EVGA consumer grade power supplies in the unit.We’re talking almost a 75 amp load (6*1500/120), disregarding power factor. He could very well overload the circuit panel and trip the main breaker for the house.

Let’s take a look inside this guy. This is from an earlier version of the Minirig (note the single power supply)This is apparently from an earlier FPGA but it will give you a good glimpse at what kind of craftsmanship you can expect from a computer that is half the average household income in the United States.

Consumer grade PSU and cheap USB hubs glued to the inside case.

Consumer grade PSU and cheap USB hubs glued to the inside case.

Electrical tape and random velcro glued to the insides

Electrical tape and random velcro glued to the insides

A closer look at the USB hubs. Plugs are hot glued to stay secured.

A closer look at the USB hubs. Plugs are hot glued to stay secured.

Electrical tape everywhere, splices and voided hardware are the theme.

Electrical tape everywhere, splices and voided hardware are the theme.

You can view the entire album here.

Despite all that, this thing can still mine bitcoins and it should be profitable. Keep in ind that many people jumped in on the preorders a year ago when bitcoins were still hovering around $6.50 per. Meaning customers paid 1562 bitcoins for that particular piece of shit, which at today’s value is $156,200. Aston martin money. How long will it take them to make their money back? If the difficulty didn’t change, they would make 37 bitcoins a day and recoup the initial investment in 124 days. Difficulty is jumping pretty much 20% every 12 days or so, so in the next week before adjustment, they’ll make 259, the next 12 days 369, the next 12 days 312, then 256, then 213, etc.

So by day 127, they’ll be halfway to breaking even, but by day 151 they’ll be making less than 5 bitcoins a day, and even if difficulty stopped rising at that point(which it won’t), it would take another 435 days for a total of 586 days to break even. If difficulty kept rising at the same pace, by day 200 they’d be making 2.4 bitcoins per day, and it would take 1024 days to break even with no difficulty increase. Assuming 25 cents per kw/h, and $100 a bitcoin, it would cost 0.43 of a bitcoin per day in electricity which means the unit would no longer be profitable on a power usage basis by day 307, at which point it will have produced 2620 bitcoins.

Bear in mind this is only for the first few units, and that’s running 24/7 pumping out around 24,000 BTU, so yes, medical bills from heat stroke will be on top of that.

But Alas, the chips don’t run nearly as well as they’re supposed to, frequently running too hot and giving multiple hardware failures. Coindesk noted in one of the first ever runs of the Minirig by hosting provide gigavps that it was running much too hot and erroring out.

At the time of posting, gigavps warned that the unit would be repeatedly shut down while ckolivas, who was assisting, modified the machines software to optimise performance. After some tweaking, the device was said to have been left to run continuously for two hours, and was shown to have an average hash rate of 478.1 GH/s. As you can see in the table below, ASIC number four (of a total of eight hashing chips) ran significantly hotter (86 degrees) and consequently gave the highest hardware (HW) error rate.

bitforce500-2hr

 

So, what happens if you just decide you don’t want this, you don’t want to wait over a year to get a $22,000 broken piece of shit? Nothing, because BFL won’t let you cancel your preorder because they’re now “shipping”, i.e. they sent out one unit to their own company shill.

bfl-cancel

 

Which is of course illegal regardless of what Butterfly Labs may say.

So in summary: Don’t buy anything from Butterfly Labs … ever.

 

UPDATE:Butterfly Labs get a miner seized in Germany for faking CE certifications.

The post The $22,484.00 Butterfly Labs Mini Rig bitcoin miner is a huge, broken, unstable piece of shit. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/butterfly-labs-mini-rig-is-a-huge-broken-unstable-piece-of-shit/feed 74
Wired burns virtual currency to troll bitcoiners http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/wired-burns-virtual-currency-to-troll-bitcoiners http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/wired-burns-virtual-currency-to-troll-bitcoiners#comments Sat, 11 May 2013 23:20:51 +0000 http://buttcoin.org/?p=1448 Wired got sent a bitcoin miner from Butterfly Labs�and they put it through it’s paces. Wired then decided to setup the most boring “Let’s Play” and start livestreaming the thing just hashing away, a mind numbing endless stream of random numbers on a screen. Since Wired is a journalistic entity and it would probably be […]

The post Wired burns virtual currency to troll bitcoiners appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
Wired got sent a bitcoin miner from Butterfly Labs�and they put it through it’s paces. Wired then decided to setup the most boring “Let’s Play” and start livestreaming the thing just hashing away, a mind numbing endless stream of random numbers on a screen.

Since Wired is a journalistic entity and it would probably be very unethical to profit off the mining of a free review unit sent by a company, Wired decided to destroy the keys to the wallet file used to store the bitcoins.

But in the end, the answer was obvious. The world

The post Wired burns virtual currency to troll bitcoiners appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]> http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/wired-burns-virtual-currency-to-troll-bitcoiners/feed 10 Wired finds out the new Butterfly Labs Bitcoin miner is utterly useless. http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/wired-finds-out-the-new-butterfly-labs-bitcoin-miner-is-utterly-useless http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/wired-finds-out-the-new-butterfly-labs-bitcoin-miner-is-utterly-useless#comments Fri, 03 May 2013 21:10:48 +0000 http://buttcoin.org/?p=1368 Wired got to be one of the lucky few to actually get a Butterfly Labs miner. Hey, you gotta perpetuate the scam somehow!   Here’s what they had to say: Wired has taken possession of a 5-Gigahash per second Bitcoin Miner, built by Butterfly Labs

The post Wired finds out the new Butterfly Labs Bitcoin miner is utterly useless. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]>
Wired got to be one of the lucky few to actually get a Butterfly Labs miner. Hey, you gotta perpetuate the scam somehow!

 

Here’s what they had to say:

Wired has taken possession of a 5-Gigahash per second Bitcoin Miner, built by Butterfly Labs

The post Wired finds out the new Butterfly Labs Bitcoin miner is utterly useless. appeared first on Buttcoin Foundation.

]]> http://www.buttcoinfoundation.org/wired-finds-out-the-new-butterfly-labs-bitcoin-miner-is-utterly-useless/feed 12