“Also lol at the bitcoin wiki. Yeah I trust those dudes.”
You just basically said that for you to be able to understand if some piece of information is right or wrong you instead of thinking for yourself prefer to decide on the basis of how much you trust the informant… now THAT explains a lot…

Also lol at the bitcoin wiki. Yeah I trust those dudes.

The blocksize can and will be increased, processing times won’t be largely affected by more people using the currency, but anyway, it’s one minor flaw that is being addressed and it’s certainly a factual one, not a make-believe one.

I know of a better article that talks about the bitcoin flaws, the bicoin wiki itself has very good information about it, https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Weaknesses

If you want an actual breakdown on the fundamental flaws and why bitcoin cannot succeed at it’s intended goal, read the wonderful Bitcoin FAQ written by a friend of the site.
http://brokenlibrarian.org/bitcoin/

Dumb criticism isn’t valid criticism, it falls more into the category of offending/badmouthing because it’s hard to validly criticize what you know nothing about, which means that your critics are going to be unfounded (most of them) because you don’t have sound information in which to ground them (I’m saying “you” but I refer to everyone for every subject that is criticized with absolutely no knowledge to back it up).

If this site would dedicate itself to exposing the flaws about Bitcoin instead of saying BUBBLE BUTT SHIT PONZY DUMB BLAH BLAH BLAH it would do a much better service to the very people he’s trying to sway off of the Bitcoin ecossytem that what he’s doing now.

He could talk about the inherent lack of verification of account addresses (meaning, if lucky enough somebody can land on the same wallet address as you and take all your money), he could talk about 51% attacks, about sybil attacks, about selfish mining attacks, about blockchain forks, about double spending transactions that passed through the controls, about bitcoins that were deleted, about the blockchain bloating, about wallet hacking, about the deflationary nature of the currency (set amount is mined, people lose them forever. circulating money drops), etc, etc, etc.. But instead it just makes up some stuff about cryptocurrencies and pays for the domain/hosting of this.

P.S. I’m not seeing ads so I can’t say it’s because of the money so I assume it must be because he wants people to steer clear of BItcoin because he thinks of it as a threat, if he thinks that it is a threat and wants people to know it too then it’s his job to prove it (the burden of proof is in those that make the claims, I’d say good luck with that because Cryptocurrencies in that field are strongly backed up by published scientific papers and research) and talk about real problems, not make some half-assed texts that explains nothing and are more dumb and hysteria inducing than they are informative.